Legal Intake Triager
Overview
Legal teams are bottlenecks. Not because they're slow, but because everything gets routed to them. This skill provides a framework to determine what actually needs legal review vs. what business teams can handle themselves with proper guardrails.
The Triage Problem
CURRENT STATE (Most Companies):
──────────────────────────────
All contracts → Legal queue → Wait 3-10 days → Business frustrated
IDEAL STATE:
────────────
Low risk → Self-service with guardrails → Same day
Medium risk → Light-touch legal review → 1-2 days
High risk → Full legal review → 3-5 days
Critical → Priority legal handling → ASAP
Triage Decision Framework
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ LEGAL INTAKE DECISION TREE │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ NEW LEGAL REQUEST │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ ┌────────────────────────┐ │
│ │ Using approved template │ │
│ │ without modifications? │ │
│ └───────────┬────────────┘ │
│ │ │ │
│ YES NO │
│ │ │ │
│ ▼ ▼ │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ SELF- │ │ Check value │ │
│ │ SERVICE │ │ threshold │ │
│ └──────────┘ └──────┬───────┘ │
│ │ │
│ ┌──────────────┼──────────────┐ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ <$[X]K $[X]-[Y]K >$[Y]K │
│ │ │ │ │
│ ▼ ▼ ▼ │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │
│ │ LIGHT │ │ STANDARD │ │ FULL │ │
│ │ REVIEW │ │ REVIEW │ │ REVIEW │ │
│ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ │
│ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Request Categories
Category 1: Self-Service (No Legal Review)
Criteria - ALL must be true:
- Using approved template without modifications
- Value below self-service threshold
- Standard terms (no negotiation needed)
- Counterparty on approved list OR standard vendor/customer
Examples:
| Request Type | Self-Service If |
|---|---|
| NDA (mutual) | Using approved template, standard terms |
| Simple SOW | Under threshold, approved template, existing MSA |
| Vendor agreement | Under threshold, standard SaaS terms |
| Renewal | Same terms, no material changes |
| Amendment | Administrative changes only (contacts, addresses) |
CUSTOMIZATION REQUIRED:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Your self-service thresholds: │
│ │
│ Maximum value: $_______________ │
│ Maximum term: _____ months │
│ Approved templates: _____________________ │
│ Approved vendors list location: _________ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Category 2: Light-Touch Review
Criteria - ANY of these:
- Minor modifications to approved templates
- Value in mid-range
- Low-risk contract type with standard counterparty
- Routine contract on vendor's paper (with checklist)
Process:
LIGHT-TOUCH PROCESS:
1. Requestor completes intake form
2. Requestor completes self-review checklist
3. Legal reviews checklist + flagged items only
4. Legal approves or escalates to full review
5. Target turnaround: 1-2 business days
Self-Review Checklist (for Light-Touch):
LIGHT-TOUCH SELF-REVIEW CHECKLIST
─────────────────────────────────
Contract: _________________
Value: $_________________
Term: ___________________
REVIEW THESE CLAUSES (check if acceptable):
□ Liability cap at least [X]x contract value
□ Indemnification is mutual OR limited to IP/breach
□ Termination for convenience included OR breach cure reasonable
□ Auto-renewal notice period ≥ [X] days
□ Governing law is [acceptable jurisdictions]
□ No mandatory arbitration OR arbitration terms acceptable
□ Data protection terms present (if handling data)
□ Payment terms Net [X] or better
IF ANY BOX UNCHECKED → Escalate to Standard Review
□ All boxes checked - Submit for light-touch approval
CUSTOMIZATION REQUIRED:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Your light-touch thresholds: │
│ │
│ Value range: $_______ to $_______ │
│ Acceptable liability cap: ___x value │
│ Min auto-renewal notice: _____ days │
│ Acceptable jurisdictions: ______________ │
│ Required payment terms: Net ____ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Category 3: Standard Review
Criteria - ANY of these:
- Value in upper range
- Non-standard terms requiring negotiation
- Vendor's paper with material modifications needed
- New vendor/customer relationship
- Contract type not on approved template list
Process:
STANDARD REVIEW PROCESS:
1. Requestor completes full intake form
2. Legal assigned within 1 business day
3. Legal reviews and provides redline/comments
4. Negotiation support as needed
5. Target turnaround: 3-5 business days
Category 4: Full/Priority Review
Criteria - ANY of these:
- Value above high threshold
- Strategic relationship
- Non-standard contract type
- Significant risk factors present
- Regulatory implications
- M&A or investment related
Process:
FULL REVIEW PROCESS:
1. Intake with business context call
2. Senior legal assigned
3. Full review with risk assessment
4. Cross-functional input if needed
5. Executive approval if required
6. Target turnaround: 5-10 business days (expedite available)
CUSTOMIZATION REQUIRED:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Your full review thresholds: │
│ │
│ Value threshold: Above $_______ │
│ Term threshold: Above _____ years │
│ Strategic vendors/customers: ____________ │
│ Always full review: ____________________ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Category 5: Immediate Escalation
Always escalate immediately (regardless of value):
- Litigation / threatened litigation
- Regulatory inquiry or investigation
- Data breach or security incident
- Employment disputes / terminations
- M&A / investment opportunities
- IP infringement claims
- Whistleblower complaints
- Government contracts
- Media inquiries with legal implications
Intake Form
Basic Information
LEGAL REQUEST INTAKE FORM
═════════════════════════
REQUESTOR INFORMATION
─────────────────────
Name: _________________________
Department: ____________________
Date: _________________________
Urgency: □ Routine □ Urgent □ Emergency
REQUEST TYPE
────────────
□ Contract Review (new)
□ Contract Review (renewal)
□ Contract Review (amendment)
□ NDA
□ Legal Question/Advice
□ Employment Matter
□ Regulatory/Compliance
□ IP Matter
□ Litigation/Dispute
□ Other: _________________
CONTRACT DETAILS (if applicable)
────────────────────────────────
Contract type: _________________
Counterparty: __________________
Our role: □ Vendor □ Customer □ Partner □ Other
Value: $________ □ Total □ Annual
Term: _______ months/years
Auto-renewal: □ Yes □ No
Context and Risk Factors
BUSINESS CONTEXT
────────────────
Why do we need this?
___________________________________________
What's the deadline and why?
___________________________________________
What happens if we don't get this done?
___________________________________________
RISK FACTORS (check all that apply)
───────────────────────────────────
□ Handles customer data
□ Handles employee data
□ Involves PII / PHI / financial data
□ Requires system access
□ Requires on-site presence
□ International component
□ Government/public sector
□ Regulated industry
□ New vendor (no prior relationship)
□ Non-standard terms requested
□ Competitive/strategic relationship
□ Press/PR implications
ATTACHMENTS
───────────
□ Draft contract attached
□ Vendor's paper (their template)
□ Our template
□ Prior agreements with counterparty
□ Other: _________________
Routing Logic
Routing Matrix
| Request Type | <$25K | $25K-$100K | $100K-$500K | >$500K |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDA (our template) | Self | Self | Self | Self |
| NDA (their template) | Light | Light | Standard | Standard |
| SaaS/Subscription (standard) | Light | Standard | Standard | Full |
| Services Agreement | Standard | Standard | Full | Full |
| MSA (new relationship) | Standard | Standard | Full | Full |
| MSA Amendment | Light | Light | Standard | Full |
| Partnership/Reseller | Standard | Full | Full | Full |
| Employment Agreement | — | — | Standard | Full |
| Real Estate/Lease | Standard | Standard | Full | Full |
CUSTOMIZATION REQUIRED:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Your value thresholds: │
│ │
│ Self-service max: $_______ │
│ Light-touch max: $_______ │
│ Standard max: $_______ │
│ Full review above: $_______ │
│ │
│ Adjust routing matrix above accordingly │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Routing by Risk Factor
Regardless of value, escalate to next level if:
| Risk Factor | Escalation |
|---|---|
| Handles customer PII | +1 level |
| Handles PHI (healthcare data) | Minimum Standard |
| Government/public sector | Minimum Standard |
| International (non-US law) | +1 level |
| Strategic relationship | +1 level |
| Non-standard IP terms | +1 level |
Legal Team Routing
Who Handles What
CUSTOMIZATION REQUIRED:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Your legal team routing: │
│ │
│ Commercial contracts: __________________ │
│ Employment matters: ____________________ │
│ IP/Technology: _________________________ │
│ Regulatory/Compliance: _________________ │
│ Privacy/Data protection: _______________ │
│ Real estate: ___________________________ │
│ M&A/Corporate: _________________________ │
│ │
│ Escalation contact: ____________________ │
│ Emergency contact: _____________________ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
SLA Expectations
Response Time Targets
| Review Level | First Response | Completion Target |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Service | N/A | Same day |
| Light-Touch | Same day | 1-2 business days |
| Standard | 1 business day | 3-5 business days |
| Full | 1 business day | 5-10 business days |
| Emergency | 4 hours | Best effort |
When to Expedite
EXPEDITE CRITERIA:
□ Revenue at risk (deal deadline)
□ Regulatory deadline
□ Security/breach response
□ Executive request
□ Competitive situation
EXPEDITE PROCESS:
1. Mark request as URGENT
2. Explain business impact
3. Identify hard deadline
4. Legal will prioritize accordingly
Self-Service Guardrails
Approved Template Library
CUSTOMIZATION REQUIRED:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Your approved templates: │
│ │
│ □ Mutual NDA: [location] │
│ □ One-way NDA (inbound): [location] │
│ □ One-way NDA (outbound): [location] │
│ □ Simple SOW (under MSA): [location] │
│ □ Standard MSA (vendor): [location] │
│ □ Standard MSA (customer): [location] │
│ □ Consulting agreement: [location] │
│ □ _______________________: [location] │
│ □ _______________________: [location] │
│ │
│ Template library location: _______________ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Modifications Not Allowed in Self-Service
STOP: REQUIRES LEGAL REVIEW
───────────────────────────
Any modification to:
□ Limitation of liability
□ Indemnification
□ IP ownership
□ Governing law
□ Confidentiality term extension beyond standard
□ Non-compete / non-solicit
□ Exclusivity
□ SLA commitments
□ Warranty terms
Intake Quality
Common Problems with Requests
| Problem | Impact | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| No deadline given | Can't prioritize | Always require deadline |
| Missing context | Wrong routing | Require business context |
| Wrong attachment | Delays | Verify before submission |
| Incomplete form | Back-and-forth | Required fields |
| Premature request | Wasted effort | Confirm deal is real |
Request Completeness Check
BEFORE SUBMITTING, VERIFY:
□ All required fields completed
□ Correct contract/document attached
□ Value is accurate (not placeholder)
□ Deadline is real (not arbitrary)
□ Business context explains WHY
□ Risk factors reviewed and checked
Resources
references/
- routing-matrix-detailed.md — Full routing rules by contract type
- template-library-guide.md — How to use approved templates
- escalation-procedures.md — When and how to escalate
scripts/
- triage-router.py — Auto-suggests routing based on inputs
assets/
- intake-form.docx — Legal intake form template
- self-review-checklist.xlsx — Light-touch review checklist
- sla-tracker.xlsx — Track legal request turnaround