Overview

Legal teams are bottlenecks. Not because they're slow, but because everything gets routed to them. This skill provides a framework to determine what actually needs legal review vs. what business teams can handle themselves with proper guardrails.

The Triage Problem

CURRENT STATE (Most Companies):
──────────────────────────────
All contracts → Legal queue → Wait 3-10 days → Business frustrated

IDEAL STATE:
────────────
Low risk → Self-service with guardrails → Same day
Medium risk → Light-touch legal review → 1-2 days  
High risk → Full legal review → 3-5 days
Critical → Priority legal handling → ASAP

Triage Decision Framework

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    LEGAL INTAKE DECISION TREE                   │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                                 │
│                     NEW LEGAL REQUEST                           │
│                           │                                     │
│                           ▼                                     │
│              ┌────────────────────────┐                        │
│              │ Using approved template │                        │
│              │ without modifications?  │                        │
│              └───────────┬────────────┘                        │
│                    │           │                                │
│                  YES          NO                                │
│                    │           │                                │
│                    ▼           ▼                                │
│              ┌──────────┐  ┌──────────────┐                    │
│              │ SELF-    │  │ Check value  │                    │
│              │ SERVICE  │  │ threshold    │                    │
│              └──────────┘  └──────┬───────┘                    │
│                                   │                             │
│                    ┌──────────────┼──────────────┐             │
│                    │              │              │              │
│                 <$[X]K      $[X]-[Y]K        >$[Y]K            │
│                    │              │              │              │
│                    ▼              ▼              ▼              │
│              ┌──────────┐  ┌──────────┐  ┌──────────┐          │
│              │ LIGHT    │  │ STANDARD │  │ FULL     │          │
│              │ REVIEW   │  │ REVIEW   │  │ REVIEW   │          │
│              └──────────┘  └──────────┘  └──────────┘          │
│                                                                 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Request Categories

Criteria - ALL must be true:

  • Using approved template without modifications
  • Value below self-service threshold
  • Standard terms (no negotiation needed)
  • Counterparty on approved list OR standard vendor/customer

Examples:

Request Type Self-Service If
NDA (mutual) Using approved template, standard terms
Simple SOW Under threshold, approved template, existing MSA
Vendor agreement Under threshold, standard SaaS terms
Renewal Same terms, no material changes
Amendment Administrative changes only (contacts, addresses)
CUSTOMIZATION REQUIRED:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Your self-service thresholds:               │
│                                             │
│ Maximum value: $_______________             │
│ Maximum term: _____ months                  │
│ Approved templates: _____________________   │
│ Approved vendors list location: _________   │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Category 2: Light-Touch Review

Criteria - ANY of these:

  • Minor modifications to approved templates
  • Value in mid-range
  • Low-risk contract type with standard counterparty
  • Routine contract on vendor's paper (with checklist)

Process:

LIGHT-TOUCH PROCESS:
1. Requestor completes intake form
2. Requestor completes self-review checklist
3. Legal reviews checklist + flagged items only
4. Legal approves or escalates to full review
5. Target turnaround: 1-2 business days

Self-Review Checklist (for Light-Touch):

LIGHT-TOUCH SELF-REVIEW CHECKLIST
─────────────────────────────────
Contract: _________________
Value: $_________________
Term: ___________________

REVIEW THESE CLAUSES (check if acceptable):

□ Liability cap at least [X]x contract value
□ Indemnification is mutual OR limited to IP/breach
□ Termination for convenience included OR breach cure reasonable
□ Auto-renewal notice period ≥ [X] days
□ Governing law is [acceptable jurisdictions]
□ No mandatory arbitration OR arbitration terms acceptable
□ Data protection terms present (if handling data)
□ Payment terms Net [X] or better

IF ANY BOX UNCHECKED → Escalate to Standard Review

□ All boxes checked - Submit for light-touch approval
CUSTOMIZATION REQUIRED:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Your light-touch thresholds:                │
│                                             │
│ Value range: $_______ to $_______           │
│ Acceptable liability cap: ___x value        │
│ Min auto-renewal notice: _____ days         │
│ Acceptable jurisdictions: ______________    │
│ Required payment terms: Net ____            │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Category 3: Standard Review

Criteria - ANY of these:

  • Value in upper range
  • Non-standard terms requiring negotiation
  • Vendor's paper with material modifications needed
  • New vendor/customer relationship
  • Contract type not on approved template list

Process:

STANDARD REVIEW PROCESS:
1. Requestor completes full intake form
2. Legal assigned within 1 business day
3. Legal reviews and provides redline/comments
4. Negotiation support as needed
5. Target turnaround: 3-5 business days

Category 4: Full/Priority Review

Criteria - ANY of these:

  • Value above high threshold
  • Strategic relationship
  • Non-standard contract type
  • Significant risk factors present
  • Regulatory implications
  • M&A or investment related

Process:

FULL REVIEW PROCESS:
1. Intake with business context call
2. Senior legal assigned
3. Full review with risk assessment
4. Cross-functional input if needed
5. Executive approval if required
6. Target turnaround: 5-10 business days (expedite available)
CUSTOMIZATION REQUIRED:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Your full review thresholds:                │
│                                             │
│ Value threshold: Above $_______             │
│ Term threshold: Above _____ years           │
│ Strategic vendors/customers: ____________   │
│ Always full review: ____________________    │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Category 5: Immediate Escalation

Always escalate immediately (regardless of value):

  • Litigation / threatened litigation
  • Regulatory inquiry or investigation
  • Data breach or security incident
  • Employment disputes / terminations
  • M&A / investment opportunities
  • IP infringement claims
  • Whistleblower complaints
  • Government contracts
  • Media inquiries with legal implications

Intake Form

Basic Information

LEGAL REQUEST INTAKE FORM
═════════════════════════

REQUESTOR INFORMATION
─────────────────────
Name: _________________________
Department: ____________________
Date: _________________________
Urgency: □ Routine □ Urgent □ Emergency

REQUEST TYPE
────────────
□ Contract Review (new)
□ Contract Review (renewal)
□ Contract Review (amendment)
□ NDA
□ Legal Question/Advice
□ Employment Matter
□ Regulatory/Compliance
□ IP Matter
□ Litigation/Dispute
□ Other: _________________

CONTRACT DETAILS (if applicable)
────────────────────────────────
Contract type: _________________
Counterparty: __________________
Our role: □ Vendor □ Customer □ Partner □ Other
Value: $________ □ Total □ Annual
Term: _______ months/years
Auto-renewal: □ Yes □ No

Context and Risk Factors

BUSINESS CONTEXT
────────────────
Why do we need this?
___________________________________________

What's the deadline and why?
___________________________________________

What happens if we don't get this done?
___________________________________________

RISK FACTORS (check all that apply)
───────────────────────────────────
□ Handles customer data
□ Handles employee data
□ Involves PII / PHI / financial data
□ Requires system access
□ Requires on-site presence
□ International component
□ Government/public sector
□ Regulated industry
□ New vendor (no prior relationship)
□ Non-standard terms requested
□ Competitive/strategic relationship
□ Press/PR implications

ATTACHMENTS
───────────
□ Draft contract attached
□ Vendor's paper (their template)
□ Our template
□ Prior agreements with counterparty
□ Other: _________________

Routing Logic

Routing Matrix

Request Type <$25K $25K-$100K $100K-$500K >$500K
NDA (our template) Self Self Self Self
NDA (their template) Light Light Standard Standard
SaaS/Subscription (standard) Light Standard Standard Full
Services Agreement Standard Standard Full Full
MSA (new relationship) Standard Standard Full Full
MSA Amendment Light Light Standard Full
Partnership/Reseller Standard Full Full Full
Employment Agreement Standard Full
Real Estate/Lease Standard Standard Full Full
CUSTOMIZATION REQUIRED:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Your value thresholds:                      │
│                                             │
│ Self-service max: $_______                  │
│ Light-touch max: $_______                   │
│ Standard max: $_______                      │
│ Full review above: $_______                 │
│                                             │
│ Adjust routing matrix above accordingly     │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Routing by Risk Factor

Regardless of value, escalate to next level if:

Risk Factor Escalation
Handles customer PII +1 level
Handles PHI (healthcare data) Minimum Standard
Government/public sector Minimum Standard
International (non-US law) +1 level
Strategic relationship +1 level
Non-standard IP terms +1 level

Who Handles What

CUSTOMIZATION REQUIRED:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Your legal team routing:                    │
│                                             │
│ Commercial contracts: __________________    │
│ Employment matters: ____________________    │
│ IP/Technology: _________________________    │
│ Regulatory/Compliance: _________________    │
│ Privacy/Data protection: _______________    │
│ Real estate: ___________________________    │
│ M&A/Corporate: _________________________    │
│                                             │
│ Escalation contact: ____________________    │
│ Emergency contact: _____________________    │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘

SLA Expectations

Response Time Targets

Review Level First Response Completion Target
Self-Service N/A Same day
Light-Touch Same day 1-2 business days
Standard 1 business day 3-5 business days
Full 1 business day 5-10 business days
Emergency 4 hours Best effort

When to Expedite

EXPEDITE CRITERIA:
□ Revenue at risk (deal deadline)
□ Regulatory deadline
□ Security/breach response
□ Executive request
□ Competitive situation

EXPEDITE PROCESS:
1. Mark request as URGENT
2. Explain business impact
3. Identify hard deadline
4. Legal will prioritize accordingly

Self-Service Guardrails

Approved Template Library

CUSTOMIZATION REQUIRED:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Your approved templates:                    │
│                                             │
│ □ Mutual NDA: [location]                    │
│ □ One-way NDA (inbound): [location]         │
│ □ One-way NDA (outbound): [location]        │
│ □ Simple SOW (under MSA): [location]        │
│ □ Standard MSA (vendor): [location]         │
│ □ Standard MSA (customer): [location]       │
│ □ Consulting agreement: [location]          │
│ □ _______________________: [location]       │
│ □ _______________________: [location]       │
│                                             │
│ Template library location: _______________  │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Modifications Not Allowed in Self-Service

STOP: REQUIRES LEGAL REVIEW
───────────────────────────
Any modification to:
□ Limitation of liability
□ Indemnification
□ IP ownership
□ Governing law
□ Confidentiality term extension beyond standard
□ Non-compete / non-solicit
□ Exclusivity
□ SLA commitments
□ Warranty terms

Intake Quality

Common Problems with Requests

Problem Impact Solution
No deadline given Can't prioritize Always require deadline
Missing context Wrong routing Require business context
Wrong attachment Delays Verify before submission
Incomplete form Back-and-forth Required fields
Premature request Wasted effort Confirm deal is real

Request Completeness Check

BEFORE SUBMITTING, VERIFY:
□ All required fields completed
□ Correct contract/document attached
□ Value is accurate (not placeholder)
□ Deadline is real (not arbitrary)
□ Business context explains WHY
□ Risk factors reviewed and checked

Resources

references/

  • routing-matrix-detailed.md — Full routing rules by contract type
  • template-library-guide.md — How to use approved templates
  • escalation-procedures.md — When and how to escalate

scripts/

  • triage-router.py — Auto-suggests routing based on inputs

assets/

  • intake-form.docx — Legal intake form template
  • self-review-checklist.xlsx — Light-touch review checklist
  • sla-tracker.xlsx — Track legal request turnaround

Legal Intake Triager

By Agentman

Decision framework for routing legal requests - when legal review is required vs. when business can self-serve. Reduces legal bottleneck while ensuring appropriate oversight. Customize with your company's thresholds, approved templates, and routing rules.

Legalv
legal-intaketriageworkflowself-serviceroutinglegal-opscontractsSLA

Included Files

  • SKILL.md(17.4 KB)— shown above

Ready to use this skill?

Attach it to your Agentman agents, or clone it and make it yours.

Free to use. Clone this and any other public skill with a free Agentman account — publishing your own is free up to 10 skills.

AgentSkills is more than a copy-paste library

  • Versioned, not pastedEdit a skill once and every agent using it follows the new version.
  • Shared with your teamOne library with per-skill access control and a record of who did what.
  • One connectionA single MCP link works across Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and Agentman agents.
Explore AgentSkills →

Or try it in an assistant