Proposal Generator

Overview

Transform proposal creation from document assembly into strategic deal architecture. This skill encodes the pricing logic, scoping frameworks, and persuasion structures that separate winning proposals from generic quotes. Every proposal should demonstrate understanding of the buyer's world, quantify value delivered, and reduce perceived risk.

When to Use This Skill

  • New proposal creation — Building proposals from discovery insights
  • Proposal customization — Adapting templates for specific buyers or industries
  • Pricing strategy — Determining optimal pricing model and structure
  • Scope definition — Translating requirements into deliverables
  • ROI justification — Building business case with defensible assumptions
  • Proposal review — Improving existing proposals before submission

Proposal Architecture

The Winning Proposal Formula

Compelling Proposal = (Understood Problem × Credible Solution × Quantified Value) / Perceived Risk

Every proposal section should reinforce one of these elements.

Standard Proposal Structure

Section Purpose Length Key Elements
Executive Summary Hook decision-makers 1 page Problem, solution, value, ask
Understanding Prove you listened 1-2 pages Their situation, goals, challenges
Solution What you'll deliver 2-4 pages Approach, deliverables, timeline
Why Us Differentiation 1 page Credentials, proof points, fit
Investment Pricing and terms 1-2 pages Options, breakdown, ROI
Next Steps Clear path forward Half page Actions, timeline, contacts
Appendix Supporting detail As needed Case studies, team bios, technical specs

Section-by-Section Guidance

Executive Summary

The most important page. Many decision-makers read only this.

Structure:

  1. The Challenge (2-3 sentences) — Restate their problem in their language
  2. Our Approach (2-3 sentences) — How we uniquely solve it
  3. Expected Outcomes (2-3 bullet points) — Quantified benefits
  4. The Investment (1 sentence) — Total investment range
  5. The Ask (1 sentence) — Specific next step

Example Opening:

[Company] is experiencing [specific problem], resulting in [quantified impact]. After [discovery/workshop], we've designed a [solution type] that will [primary outcome] while [secondary benefit]. Based on similar engagements with [reference customer type], we expect [specific results]. The investment for this engagement is [range], with implementation beginning [timeframe].

Do NOT:

  • Lead with your company history
  • Use generic benefits language
  • Bury the price
  • Forget the clear ask

Understanding Section

Demonstrate that you understand their world better than competitors.

Include:

  • Their current situation (factual, not judgmental)
  • Business context driving the need
  • Specific challenges identified in discovery
  • Goals and success criteria they stated
  • Constraints they've mentioned (budget, timeline, resources)

Structure Options:

Option 1: Situation → Challenge → Goal

Your team currently [current state]. This creates challenges including [challenge 1], [challenge 2], and [challenge 3]. Your goal is to [desired outcome] by [timeframe].

Option 2: Quote-Led

As [contact name] noted in our discovery call: "[their words]." This reflects a broader challenge we've seen with [customer type] — [insight].

Do NOT:

  • Make assumptions not validated in discovery
  • Be negative about their current approach
  • Include information they didn't share
  • Make this section about you

Solution Section

What you'll deliver, how, and when.

Approach Subsection

Explain your methodology without jargon:

  • Why this approach works
  • What makes it different
  • How it addresses their specific challenges
Deliverables Subsection

Be specific and visual:

Phase Deliverable Description Timeline
Phase 1 Discovery Workshop 2-day onsite session mapping requirements Week 1-2
Phase 2 Solution Design Architecture document with integration plan Week 3-4
Phase 3 Implementation Configured system with data migration Week 5-12
Phase 4 Training 3 training sessions with documentation Week 13
Phase 5 Hypercare 30-day dedicated support post-launch Week 14-17
Timeline Subsection

Visual timeline preferred:

Week 1-2    [====] Discovery & Planning
Week 3-4    [====] Design & Configuration
Week 5-8    [========] Implementation Sprint 1
Week 9-12   [========] Implementation Sprint 2
Week 13     [==] Training & Documentation
Week 14-17  [========] Hypercare & Optimization
Assumptions & Dependencies

Explicitly state what you need from them:

  • Stakeholder availability for [X] hours per week
  • Access to [systems/data] by [date]
  • Decision authority present for [milestone] reviews
  • [Resource] assigned as project owner

Why Us Section

Differentiate without bragging.

Structure:

  1. Relevant experience — Similar customers, similar problems
  2. Unique approach — What you do differently
  3. Proof points — Results from comparable engagements
  4. Team fit — Why this team for this project

Proof Point Format:

[Similar Company] faced [similar challenge]. We [approach taken], resulting in [specific outcome] within [timeframe].

Do NOT:

  • List every award and certification
  • Include generic company history
  • Claim to be "industry-leading" without proof
  • Make this longer than 1 page

Investment Section

This is where deals are won or lost.

Pricing Presentation Options

Option A: Single Price with Breakdown

Component Description Investment
Implementation [Scope description] $X
Training [Scope description] $Y
Year 1 License [Scope description] $Z
Total Investment $Total

Option B: Good/Better/Best

Starter Professional Enterprise
Core Platform
Advanced Analytics
Dedicated Support
Investment $X/mo $Y/mo $Z/mo

Option C: Modular/Build-Your-Own

Module Description Investment Required?
Core Platform [Description] $X Yes
Module A [Description] $Y Optional
Module B [Description] $Z Optional
ROI Justification

Include a defensible ROI calculation:

Investment: $100,000

Expected Returns:

  • Time savings: 20 hours/week × $50/hour × 52 weeks = $52,000/year
  • Error reduction: 15% fewer errors × $200/error × 500 errors/year = $15,000/year
  • Revenue uplift: 5% conversion improvement × $500K pipeline = $25,000/year

Total Annual Value: $92,000 Payback Period: 13 months 3-Year ROI: 176%

Assumptions (stated clearly):

  • Current process requires X hours for Y tasks
  • Error rate based on industry benchmark / their stated rate
  • Conversion improvement based on [reference customer] results

Next Steps Section

Make it impossible to misunderstand what happens next.

Include:

  1. Decision needed — What you're asking them to approve
  2. By when — Deadline for decision/signature
  3. What happens after — First steps post-signature
  4. Key contacts — Who to reach with questions

Example:

To proceed, we need:

  1. Signed proposal by [date] to secure [timeline/resources]
  2. Kick-off call scheduled within 5 business days of signature
  3. Project sponsor identified for weekly check-ins

Upon signature, [Your Name] will reach out within 24 hours to schedule kick-off.

Pricing Strategy Selection

Pricing Model Decision Tree

Is the value easily quantified?
├─ Yes → Usage-based or outcome-based pricing
└─ No → 
    Is the scope well-defined?
    ├─ Yes → Fixed fee
    └─ No → 
        Is the relationship ongoing?
        ├─ Yes → Subscription/retainer
        └─ No → Time & materials with cap

Pricing Model Comparison

Model Best For Pros Cons
Per-seat Software, scalable value Predictable, grows with customer May limit adoption
Usage-based Consumption-driven value Aligns cost with value Revenue unpredictable
Flat subscription Consistent service delivery Simple, predictable May undercharge large users
Tiered Segmented markets Captures different WTP Complexity in positioning
Fixed project Defined scope, clear deliverables Budget certainty Scope creep risk
T&M with cap Uncertain scope Flexibility Cost uncertainty
Outcome-based Measurable ROI Aligns incentives Attribution challenges

Discounting Guidelines

Discount Type When Appropriate Maximum Require Approval
Volume Multi-year or enterprise deals 20% VP+ for >15%
Pilot/POC Land-and-expand strategy 50% Director+
Competitive Documented competitive situation 15% VP+ for >10%
Strategic Logo/reference value 25% Exec sponsor
Non-profit/EDU Qualified organizations 30% Standard

Never discount without:

  • Clear reason documented
  • Something received in return (case study, timeline, multi-year)
  • Approval at appropriate level

Industry-Specific Customization

Healthcare Proposals

Must Include:

  • HIPAA compliance statement
  • BAA (Business Associate Agreement) reference
  • Data handling and security section
  • Implementation approach that minimizes clinical disruption
  • Reference customers in healthcare (with appropriate permissions)

Language Adjustments:

  • "Patients" not "users"
  • "Clinical workflows" not "business processes"
  • "Care quality" not "efficiency"
  • Emphasize patient outcomes alongside operational benefits

Financial Services Proposals

Must Include:

  • Security and compliance certifications
  • Data residency and sovereignty details
  • Audit and reporting capabilities
  • Vendor risk assessment support
  • Regulatory compliance mapping (SOX, PCI, etc.)

Language Adjustments:

  • Emphasize risk mitigation
  • Lead with security
  • Include regulatory references
  • Focus on accuracy and auditability

Technology/SaaS Proposals

Must Include:

  • Technical architecture overview
  • Integration approach and APIs
  • Scalability and performance specs
  • SLA terms
  • Migration/implementation methodology

Language Adjustments:

  • Can be more technical
  • Emphasize innovation and roadmap
  • Focus on developer experience
  • Include technical proof points

Quality Checklist

Before sending any proposal, verify:

Content Quality

  • Executive summary can stand alone
  • Every claim has a proof point
  • ROI calculations have stated assumptions
  • Timeline is realistic and specific
  • Scope matches what was discussed

Formatting

  • No typos or grammatical errors
  • Customer name correct throughout
  • Contact names and titles accurate
  • Dates are realistic (not already passed)
  • Page numbers and TOC match

Persuasion Elements

  • Addresses their stated priorities
  • Includes relevant social proof
  • Risk mitigation is present
  • Call to action is clear
  • Urgency is appropriate

Commercial

  • Pricing approved by appropriate level
  • Terms are current and accurate
  • Validity period is stated
  • Payment terms are clear
  • Any discounts are documented

Resources

references/

  • pricing-playbook.md — Detailed pricing strategies by deal type and customer segment
  • objection-responses.md — Common proposal objections with responses
  • industry-templates.md — Industry-specific content blocks and compliance language
  • roi-methodologies.md — Defensible ROI calculation frameworks by use case

scripts/

  • roi-calculator.py — Generates ROI analysis from input parameters
  • proposal-validator.py — Checks proposal against quality checklist

assets/

  • proposal-template.docx — Branded proposal template with placeholders
  • pricing-tables.xlsx — Pre-built pricing table formats
  • timeline-template.pptx — Visual timeline templates

Proposal Generator

By Agentman

This skill should be used when creating sales proposals, quotes, SOWs, or pricing documents. It provides scope definition frameworks, pricing model selection logic, ROI calculation methodologies, and proposal structure templates. Use for proposal creation, deal structuring, pricing strategy, or customizing proposals for specific industries and deal sizes.

Salesv
proposalspricingROIdeal-closingdocument-generationB2Benterprise-sales

Included Files

  • SKILL.md(12.7 KB)— shown above

Ready to use this skill?

Attach it to your Agentman agents, or clone it and make it yours.

Free to use. Clone this and any other public skill with a free Agentman account — publishing your own is free up to 10 skills.

AgentSkills is more than a copy-paste library

  • Versioned, not pastedEdit a skill once and every agent using it follows the new version.
  • Shared with your teamOne library with per-skill access control and a record of who did what.
  • One connectionA single MCP link works across Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor and Agentman agents.
Explore AgentSkills →

Or try it in an assistant