6sense
Ask an AI agent about 6sense account insights, buying signals and keyword trends.
Model content, author pages and publish to a live site from an AI agent.
Opens Agent Studio, where connecting is one click. The connector URL below works in any MCP client.
Paste it into any MCP client. Setup docs
The Agility CMS MCP server connects a headless content management system to Claude, ChatGPT and any MCP-compatible agent. It models content, authors pages, uploads media and publishes updates to a live website. Agility documents 32 tools; Anthropic's directory lists 27 and omits every publish tool. Sign-in is OAuth 2.0.
Verified connector
Listed by Anthropic as a partner connector in its Connectors Directory.
Connection checked by Agentman on .
Anthropic states this reflects the level of review a connector received, not a security audit.
Tool names from Anthropic's directory listing. This server requires sign-in, so we could not read tool descriptions or parameter schemas.
https://mcp.agilitycms.com advertises exactly one scope, offline_access, which governs refresh-token lifetime rather than access. The RFC 9728 resource descriptor declares no scopes_supported at all. There is no way to grant reading without also granting publishing and deleting.humanConfirmed: false. Choosing "always allow" in any client also opts out, and Agility notes the server cannot override that.approve, decline and request-approval as "not gated (low risk)", so an agent can request and grant approval on the same item.manage_content_workflow; the live catalog attributes it to publish_content and says the workflow tool does not publish. The catalog and README are newer and agree.destructiveHint claims are Agility's, not our observation.github.com/agility/agility-mcp-server, which returned 404 on 2026-08-23. The real repository is github.com/agility/mcp-server. The same page's npx install for agility-mcp-server also 404s on the npm registry, so the documented local install cannot work as written.Yes, and that is the tool's stated purpose. Agility's live tool catalog documents publish_content as taking content items live and publish_page as taking pages live, both read on 2026-08-23. Anything published becomes visible to real visitors on your website. Neither tool appears in Anthropic's directory listing of 27 tools.
The directory entry is a snapshot of version 2.0.0 taken when the connector was added on 2026-06-19. Agility's README and live tool catalog both document 32 tools. The five missing names are publish_content, unpublish_content, publish_page, unpublish_page and save_page_model, so the omission falls entirely on the publishing surface.
Yes. Three tools delete: delete_content_item, delete_page and delete_media. Agility describes each as permanently removing the record, moving it to a Deleted state. Deleting a page removes it from the sitemap, and Agility advises unpublishing a live page first. All three carry destructiveHint so interactive clients prompt before running them.
No, and Agility is explicit about it. Its documentation states that save_content_items always saves to the instance's default workflow state, typically Staging, and that a state value passed on save is not honored. Taking content live requires a separate publish call, so an ordinary save cannot reach your visitors by itself.
Yes. manage_content_workflow and manage_page_workflow perform approve, decline and request-approval actions, and Agility's documentation states approve and decline are not gated because they are low risk. An agent holding a permitted account can therefore request approval and then approve the same item without a person intervening.
Only offline_access, which controls refresh-token lifetime rather than access. Agility's authorization server advertised that single scope on 2026-08-23 and the RFC 9728 resource descriptor names no scopes at all. Nothing at the consent screen separates reading a content item from deleting one or publishing it.
Sign in as a restricted Agility user. Agility states your account permissions are the ceiling, that every call runs as you, and that the Management API refuses anything you personally cannot do. Because no OAuth scope narrows anything, the Agility user account you authenticate with is the only real boundary available.
No. The public repository at github.com/agility/mcp-server contains only documentation, a licence and a security policy. Its README states the server's source is maintained by Agility CMS and is not currently published. So the confirmation and permission behaviour described in the docs cannot be verified by reading code.
__NEXT_DATA__ JSON payload of the same response, and a text extractor reports it as near-empty. · retrieved 2026-08-23llms.txt (retrieved 2026-08-23) · retrieved 2026-08-23https://mcp.agilitycms.com/api/mcp returned 401 with a www-authenticate challenge naming the resource metadata; RFC 9728 descriptor at https://mcp.agilitycms.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource; authorization server metadata at https://mcp.agilitycms.com/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server (2026-08-23). Three control paths on the same host returned 404 with an identical body hash, so both 200s are genuine. · retrieved 2026-08-23Connect Agility CMS once and your agents call these tools on their own: on a schedule, in a workflow, with nobody at the keyboard.