Eedi

Eedi states it does not. Its press release, its help-centre article and its reference documentation each say the integration is teacher-only and that no student data is collected or processed through it, citing Anthropic's under-18 policy. Both tools read a published question bank rather than a class roster. We could not test this — the endpoint requires a teacher account.

The two sources disagree. Eedi's documentation names get_eedi_questions and search_eedi_questions in a screenshot table; Anthropic's directory lists get_questions and search_questions. The two sets share no member. Both describe the same pair of read-only operations — fetch by question ID, and search the bank by topic, standard or keyword — so this reads as a naming drift, not a hidden tool.

No, according to Eedi. Its help-centre article states the connector cannot change anything in your account or affect your students, and that it only reads and displays questions. Anthropic's directory records the permission as Read. Neither tool name carries a create, update or delete verb, and Eedi calls both tools read-only in three separate places.

A question stem, a diagram, the correct answer with a worked explanation, and every wrong option labelled with the specific misconception it targets. Eedi states each distractor is engineered against misconceptions observed in hundreds of millions of student responses. The misconception labels describe the question's design, not any named pupil's performance.

Exactly one, called mcp. Eedi's RFC 9728 resource descriptor and its authorization server metadata both advertise a single scope of that name, read live on 2026-08-22. It is an access flag, not a permission boundary, so consent cannot separate searching from fetching. With a read-only two-tool surface there is nothing narrower to withhold.

No. Eedi states that teacher accounts are free for all teachers and that the Claude integration is completely free, and directs teachers to sign up at teacher.eedi.com. You need a registered Eedi teacher account and an MCP-capable AI tool. Eedi's documentation uses Claude Desktop as its worked example.

English and Spanish today, across three locales. Eedi documents EN-GB as the default with EN-US and ES-US also available, and says Claude picks a locale automatically. Questions map to Common Core and US state standards, and to the UK national curriculum. Eedi states India, Indonesia, Brazil and several African editions are planned over 18 months.

The school, not Eedi. Eedi's GDPR page states that schools are the data controllers of staff and pupil data and that Eedi acts as a data processor, holding data it does not control. That relationship governs Eedi's wider platform. The MCP connector sits outside it, because Eedi states no student data passes through the integration at all.