Keep contracts moving without burning out your lawyers
Route routine contracts to self-service and risky ones to counsel first — with four chained skills.
The termination, the investigation, the accommodation request — the moments where HR and legal overlap and mistakes get expensive. Four free Agent Skills turn improvisation into a documented, consistent process. Learn the checklists and run them in Claude.
Free to try. One click loads the skill into Claude or ChatGPT, with no account and no setup.
Employment actions carry real legal risk, and the failure mode is almost never bad intent — it’s inconsistency. The rules live in a compliance binder no one opens under pressure, so under pressure, everyone improvises. One manager documents; another doesn’t. A performance problem surfaces for the first time in the termination meeting because it was never written down.
Preventing it isn’t about knowing more law — it’s about running a consistent, documented process every time. That’s what these skills encode: the checklist, the risk gate, and the paper trail that turns the hardest conversation into a defensible one. And most of that defensibility is built long before the hard moment — in a clear role definition, a structured interview, a calibrated review.
The skill isn’t magic. It encodes proven frameworks anyone can learn. Here’s the method itself, so you understand what it’s doing for you.
The single most important thing this skill does is stop you before you act. Before it will walk you toward a performance termination, it runs a documentation check: were expectations communicated in writing? Was a PIP completed? Was there a real opportunity to improve? If the answer is no, it says do not proceed — build documentation first.
This is the discipline that separates a defensible action from an expensive one. Most wrongful-termination exposure comes not from bad intent but from inconsistency — one manager documents, another doesn’t; one termination gets a risk check, the next gets fired off on a Friday. A gate the process runs every time removes that inconsistency.
Before any termination clears, the skill runs a risk assessment most managers wouldn’t think to run. It checks protected-class considerations (is the employee over 40, pregnant, on an ADA or religious accommodation, a member of a protected group?), recent protected activity (did they file a complaint, request FMLA, report a compliance concern in the last 6–12 months?), and timing concerns (does the action follow closely after protected activity? were the performance issues documented after it?).
If any box is checked, it routes you to legal review before you act — which is the entire point. The routine 80% moves fast and self-serves; the risky 20% reaches counsel before the mistake, not after. The skill also carries FMLA/ADA workflows, a five-step investigation framework, RIF/WARN-Act analysis, and state-specific final-pay tables.
Use any one on its own, or chain them. Each hands its output to the next. Every one is free in the public library.
Process checklists and risk assessment for the hard actions — terminations, leaves, investigations — with a gate that routes protected-class or recent-protected-activity cases to legal first.
Builds leveled, competency-based, DE&I-optimized role definitions — the baseline every later performance and termination decision measures against.
Structured, behavior-anchored scorecards that turn “a bad feeling” into a documented, comparable, defensible hiring record.
Bias-checked, calibrated reviews that create the contemporaneous paper trail the navigator will demand before any action.
Any HR or manager decision where a mistake is expensive and consistency matters — which is most of them. If your process for a termination or investigation depends on which manager is handling it, you have the inconsistency problem these skills solve.
There’s a category of work no one puts on a job description but everyone dreads: the termination, the harassment complaint, the accommodation request that arrives the week after a performance write-up. These are the moments where HR and legal overlap — and where “we’ll just handle it” quietly becomes a claim.
The navigator is the anchor — it turns those hard actions into risk-gated checklists. The People trio closes the gaps that seed most employment risk long before the hard conversation: a defensible role definition (job-description-architect), a structured hiring record (interview-scorecard-designer), and calibrated, documented reviews (performance-review-calibrator). Together they make the whole employment lifecycle defensible.

Real prompts, and what the skill hands back.
“We want to terminate an employee for performance. Walk me through it — what documentation do I need, and what would make this risky?”
A decision tree with a documentation gate, then a protected-class/timing risk assessment that routes to legal review if any flag is present.
“An employee filed a harassment complaint. Give me the investigation process and tell me when I must involve legal.”
The five-step investigation framework (assess → plan → investigate → conclude → follow up) plus the always-involve-legal triggers.
It won’t proceed without the paper trail — the check most managers skip under pressure.
Protected-class, recent-activity, and timing checks catch the exposure before you act.
The risky 20% reaches counsel first; the routine 80% self-serves. Effort matches risk.
Structured hiring and calibrated reviews build the record long before the hard conversation.
State tables and retention schedules are fill-in-the-blank — it becomes your compliant playbook.
Read them in order and they’re one lifecycle: define the role (job-description-architect) → hire on a structured record (interview-scorecard-designer) → manage with calibrated reviews (performance-review-calibrator) → act with risk-gated checklists (employment-action-navigator). Each stage builds the record the next depends on.
The governance kicker: the navigator’s termination checklist is exactly the skill you share use-only — a manager runs it without reading the firm’s risk thresholds or escalation logic. See use-only sharing.
You don’t need employment counsel on retainer for every routine action. Run the navigator on the situation in front of you, and customize it with your jurisdiction’s rules:
Already connected your library to Claude? Tell it: “Use the employment-action-navigator skill (and the others above) from the agentman_skills MCP server.”
Not connected yet? The Try in Claude / ChatGPT button loads the first one from the public library, with no setup. Or connect your library.
Click “Try in Claude / ChatGPT” above, or — if you’ve connected your library — tell Claude: “Use the employment-action-navigator skill from the agentman_skills MCP server.”
Tell it what you’re facing — a performance termination, an investigation, a leave request. It routes you into the right decision tree.
It checks whether the paper trail exists (written expectations, PIP, feedback). If not, it tells you to build documentation first — before you do anything you can’t undo.
It walks the protected-class, recent-activity, and timing checks. Any red flag routes you to legal review before you act.
Fill in the fill-in-the-blank state tables — final-pay timing, retention schedules, mini-WARN thresholds — so it becomes your playbook, not a generic one.
Use job-description-architect, interview-scorecard-designer, and performance-review-calibrator so future actions rest on a documented foundation, not memory.
Consistent process beats improvisation — and the difference is a defensible action instead of an expensive one.
One click loads the skill into Claude or ChatGPT. No account, no setup.
No — it makes sure counsel is involved at the right moment. The navigator routes routine actions to self-service and flags protected-class or recent-protected-activity cases for legal review *before* a mistake. It’s the process layer around your lawyers, not a substitute for them.
Yes. Share the navigator use-only — the manager’s agent applies the checklist and risk gate to their situation, but the internal thresholds and escalation logic are not displayed or exported.
It ships with the framework plus fill-in-the-blank sections for state-specific rules — final-pay timing, retention, mini-WARN. Customize it with your jurisdiction and it becomes your compliant playbook.
No. Click “Try in Claude / ChatGPT” above and the navigator loads from our public library — no setup. Clone it into an Agentman workspace to customize and share it.