6sense
Ask an AI agent about 6sense account insights, buying signals and keyword trends.
Ask Japan's legal corpus — statutes, case law, guidelines, books — with citations.
Opens Agent Studio, where connecting is one click. The connector URL below works in any MCP client.
Paste it into any MCP client. Setup docs
The Legal Brain Agent MCP server connects LegalBrain, Bengo4.com's Japanese legal research platform, to Claude and any MCP-compatible client. Anthropic's directory lists a single tool, ask_legalbrain, which hands a question to LegalBrain's own AI agent over statutes, case law, guidelines and legal books. Sign-in is OAuth.
Verified connector
Listed by Anthropic as a partner connector in its Connectors Directory.
Connection checked by Agentman on .
Anthropic states this reflects the level of review a connector received, not a security audit.
Tool names from Anthropic's directory listing. This server requires sign-in, so we could not read tool descriptions or parameter schemas.
documentation, support and privacy_policy fields in Anthropic's directory all point at the same Tayori form, whose visible heading is "コネクタ機能 サポート窓口" — a support desk for the connector feature. It is a contact form, not a document: 13 characters of visible text, no mention of MCP or Claude. So the vendor operates a channel for connector questions and publishes no page answering them. Everything on this page comes from the product's terms, privacy policy, external-services list and press material instead.ask_legalbrain's parameters, output schema and safety annotations are unknown to us.www.bengo4.com returned HTTP 403 from an Akamai edge to every client we tried, including for robots.txt itself, so we could not read the vendor's own product page or check its crawl policy. That is a block on our client, not a statement of the vendor's wishes, and we record it as an unknown rather than as a refusal.Nothing in the published surface writes to a record you own. Anthropic's directory lists one tool, and the OAuth grant carries one scope named after it. But the reach is not read-only in the sense that matters: your prompt is sent to Bengo4.com, and its terms assign the company copyright in both your question and the generated answer. Treat it as a disclosure, not a lookup.
Both, according to Bengo4.com. Its terms define the service as presenting relevant content — statutes, legal issues, court precedents and reference lists — and then supplying prose generated from that content, which the terms name separately as seibun shou. Its June 2026 announcement states every answer displays citations to primary sources. Verify the citations rather than the prose.
No. Bengo4.com's terms prohibit it in two separate clauses. Users must not enter party names, case names or other details identifying a specific matter, and must not enter personal or confidential information belonging to themselves or a third party. The terms also state the service cannot handle contentious or disputed cases. This is the single most consequential limit on the connector.
No, and Bengo4.com says so directly. Its terms state the service does not provide legal opinions and does not substitute for any service supplied by an attorney, tax accountant, judicial scrivener, patent attorney or other legal professional. The same clause disclaims fitness, legality, accuracy, usefulness and currency, and requires the user to verify every output before relying on it.
Not individuals. Bengo4.com's terms restrict applications to corporations including law firms, to partnerships or other organisations, to attorneys, and to anyone the company approves case by case. It also reserves the right to refuse an application on creditworthiness. So a solo consumer cannot sign up, and the connector is unusable without an approved account behind it.
Yes, but the number is not public. Bengo4.com's terms state that a user exceeding the number of uses set in their individual contract may have the service restricted. The cap therefore lives in each customer's own agreement rather than on a published pricing page, so ask your account contact for your figure. No per-call rate limit is documented anywhere.
Anthropic's directory lists one, ask_legalbrain. The endpoint returned HTTP 401 to our anonymous request on 2026-09-09, so we read no live tool list and have no schema, description or safety annotation of our own. The server's OAuth descriptor independently publishes a single scope with the same name, which corroborates the count without confirming it.
No. Bengo4.com's terms restrict generated text to internal use or a scope it approves individually, and prohibit profiting by publishing, publicly transmitting or using the service as an external API. The terms also assign the company copyright in your questions and its answers, and separately prohibit using the service to train AI models.
https://api.legalbrain.com/v1/mcp — HTTP 401 with a WWW-Authenticate: Bearer challenge naming resource_metadata, on initialize, tools/list and DELETE alike; a junk bearer token returned a byte-identical body (2026-09-09). No tool list read. · retrieved 2026-09-09scopes_supported: ["ask_legalbrain"], authorization server https://account.legalbrain.com). An invented path under the same prefix returned HTTP 404, so the descriptor discriminates. · retrieved 2026-09-09robots.txt allows all agents. Its sitemap indexes 13 customer case studies and one home page; no MCP or Claude mention anywhere on the host) · retrieved 2026-09-09documentation, support and privacy_policy in Anthropic's directory — https://legalbrain.tayori.com/form/99a79c9756e8663057f5bc1e43fc999b482c1b5b (fetched 2026-09-09; HTTP 200, a Tayori contact form headed "コネクタ機能 サポート窓口", 13 characters of visible text, no MCP or Claude mention) · retrieved 2026-09-09www.bengo4.com (HTTP 403, Akamai edge, robots.txt refused too), api.legalbrain.com/ (404), legalbrain.com/llms.txt (404), research.legalbrain.com/llms.txt, /robots.txt and /sitemap.xml (all served the app shell, not the file), www.legalbrain.jp and legal-brain.jp (DNS failure) — all checked 2026-09-09 · retrieved 2026-09-09Connect Legal Brain Agent once and your agents call these tools on their own: on a schedule, in a workflow, with nobody at the keyboard.