Lawve AI

Search a public catalog of practitioner-written legal Agent Skills.

Add to Agentman Studio

Opens Agent Studio, where connecting is one click. The connector URL below works in any MCP client.

Paste it into any MCP client. Setup docs

Resources

What the Lawve AI connector does

The Lawve AI MCP server connects Claude, ChatGPT and other MCP agents to a public catalog of legal Agent Skills — methodology documents written by practicing lawyers and legal technologists. Anthropic's directory lists two read-only tools that search the catalog and fetch one skill's manifest. It reaches no case file, client document or filing system.

Verified connector

Listed by Anthropic as a partner connector in its Connectors Directory.

Connection checked by Agentman on .

Anthropic states this reflects the level of review a connector received, not a security audit.

Lawve AI tools (2)

  • lawvable_search_skills
  • lawvable_get_skill_manifest

Tool names from Anthropic's directory listing. This server requires sign-in, so we could not read tool descriptions or parameter schemas.

Limits

  • The documentation URL Anthropic publishes for this connector is dead. The directory nominates https://lawve.ai/en/learn/mcp-setup; that path returned 404 on 2026-08-23, as did llms.txt, llms-full.txt and the .md suffix on the same host. No /learn/ route exists anywhere in Lawve's 12,212-URL sitemap. The directory's privacy_policy field is stale in the same way, pointing at https://lawve.ai/en/privacy, which also 404s — so two directory fields carry the same dead /en/ prefix, suggesting the site dropped a locale prefix after the listing was written. The server itself is fully alive — a dead doc URL and a dead server are different findings. The working sources are Lawve's own posts and legal pages, reached through the sitemap and linked below.
  • Lawve publishes no tool list for this server. The two names come from Anthropic's directory. We could not diff them against a vendor enumeration because none exists. What Lawve does publish is a capability description — search the catalog, apply a skill, inspect the methodology — which matches the two names semantically but would not reveal a rename.
  • We could not read tool schemas or safety annotations. The endpoint returned 401 to an anonymous request, so no parameter-level detail is published here.
  • A prompt is advertised and could not be read. The directory lists available_skills; the authenticated endpoint prevented any prompts/list call, so its real state is unknown.
  • Retrieved skill content is untrusted input. Manifests are community-authored instructions entering an agent's context. Lawve's security audit is a review, and Lawve's terms state review is not endorsement.
  • Search quality is unverified. We never executed a search, so we cannot say how well the catalog's ranking surfaces the right skill, nor whether results are jurisdiction-filtered by default. Lawve names jurisdiction as a search dimension but publishes no ranking detail.
  • No rate limits are published. We found no documented request ceiling for the MCP endpoint. Lawve's terms prohibit bypassing rate limits, which implies limits exist without naming them.
  • Skills are not legal advice, by the vendor's own first line. Anything retrieved is a starting point for professional review. This connector does not change who is responsible for the work.
  • No metering was found. Lawve states it is currently available without a subscription fee, and no tool spends money, credits or quota. There is correspondingly no accounting tool, which is unproblematic only for as long as nothing costs anything.

Frequently asked questions

Can the Lawve AI connector read my case files or client documents?

No. Both tools operate on Lawve's public skills catalog, which is a library of published methodology documents, not a document management system. The connector holds no integration with a matter system, a DMS or a file store, and its single application scope is marketplace:read. Nothing in the surface reaches a client file.

Can the Lawve AI connector draft or file a legal document?

Neither. Both listed tools are read-only, and the scope confirms it. The catalog does contain drafting skills, so a search result can return instructions that tell your agent how to draft. Your agent then does the drafting locally, using your own tools. Nothing is filed, sent or submitted through this connector.

Does Lawve AI publish an unauthorized-practice-of-law disclaimer?

Yes, in two places. Lawve's Terms of Use open with the sentence that Lawve does not provide legal advice, adding that output is not a substitute for professional judgment. Its Anthropic partnership post repeats that skills are starting points for professional review, not legal advice. Both statements are unusually prominent.

What does Lawve AI say about attorney-client privilege?

Nothing directly. We found no privilege waiver language and no privilege guarantee in Lawve's terms or privacy policy, so we record that as silence rather than as reassurance. The terms do require that content you publish does not unlawfully disclose confidential or privileged information, which addresses publishing rather than connector use.

How many tools does the Lawve AI MCP server have?

Anthropic's directory lists two, and Lawve publishes no tool list of its own to check that against. The two names are lawvable_search_skills and lawvable_get_skill_manifest. Because no vendor enumeration exists, we cannot report a clean diff, only that there is no second list to diff against.

What OAuth permissions does the Lawve AI MCP server request?

One application scope, marketplace:read. The server's RFC 9728 resource descriptor declared exactly that scope on 2026-08-23, and its authorization server advertises it alongside openid, offline and offline_access. The scope names read and no listed tool carries a write verb, so the grant and the tool surface agree.

Is the Lawve AI skills catalog public without the connector?

Yes. Lawve's privacy policy describes the site as a public knowledge hub whose published resources can be viewed by anyone, and its skill pages load without signing in. The connector's value is bringing that catalog into a conversation, not unlocking private content. Sign-in is still required at the MCP endpoint.

Is content returned by the Lawve AI connector safe to execute?

Treat it as untrusted. The catalog is community-published, so a skill manifest is text written by a third party that arrives as agent instructions. Lawve runs a security review and shows a pass or fail badge per skill, but review is not endorsement under its own terms. Read a manifest before acting on it.

Sources

More Productivity connectors

  • 6sense

    Ask an AI agent about 6sense account insights, buying signals and keyword trends.

  • Adobe Workfront

    Find, create, update and delete Workfront work items from an AI agent.

Browse all MCP connectorsClaude and ChatGPT setup guideBrowse AI skills

Product names and logos belong to their owners. Agentman is not affiliated with a connector's maker unless the page says the connector is built and run by Agentman.

Use it in an agent

Put Lawve AI to work.

Connect Lawve AI once and your agents call these tools on their own: on a schedule, in a workflow, with nobody at the keyboard.

Open in Agentman Studio
Call (650) 285-1019Our AI receptionist answers.