6sense
Ask an AI agent about 6sense account insights, buying signals and keyword trends.
Check attorney-plan access and send a matter to a real lawyer.
Opens Agent Studio, where connecting is one click. The connector URL below works in any MCP client.
Paste it into any MCP client. Setup docs
The LegalZoom MCP server lets Claude, ChatGPT or any MCP-compatible agent check whether you have attorney-plan access, browse consultation topics and availability by US state, send a legal matter to a real attorney, and attach a document for that attorney to read. Eight tools cover it. One stages a paid plan in a cart; one commits a human lawyer's time.
Verified connector
Listed by Anthropic as a partner connector in its Connectors Directory.
Connection checked by Agentman on .
Anthropic states this reflects the level of review a connector received, not a security audit.
Tool names from Anthropic's directory listing. This server requires sign-in, so we could not read tool descriptions or parameter schemas.
request_attorney_review dispatches a matter to a human attorney and nothing here recalls it. No tool among the eight cancels or withdraws a review. LegalZoom does not document whether a dispatched request can be cancelled at all. Approve this tool per call.upload_document where Anthropic lists prepare_document_upload. One name is wrong at the wire and we could not establish which.legalzoom_mcp, appears in the RFC 8414 metadata but not in the protected-resource descriptor; the two documents disagree. No scope separates reading from dispatching.llms.txt states its primary jurisdiction is US federal and state law.No. Its cart tool adds the Business Attorney Plan to a cart and returns a checkout link the vendor's own tool description tells the model to hand you. Nothing is charged until you complete checkout in a browser yourself. That is a genuine guardrail — the purchase stops at a link rather than completing, unlike connectors whose booking tools charge a stored card directly.
It dispatches your matter to a real attorney. LegalZoom's tool description says the attorney receives your full conversation context — questions, documents and AI analysis — either as async messaging or a scheduled phone call. This commits a human being's time, and no tool in the eight-tool surface cancels or withdraws a request once it is sent. Treat it as a one-way action.
LegalZoom states it is not. Its attorney pages carry an advertisement disclosure saying information you provide to LegalZoom is not protected by attorney-client privilege, and that it is not an attorney referral service or a law firm. We report that statement and give no legal advice about it. Review the wording yourself before attaching a sensitive contract.
LegalZoom advertises unlimited 30-minute consultations on new legal matters, defining a new matter as an issue or document you have not previously discussed with a network attorney. Document review covers ten pages; longer documents carry flat fees of $69 for 11-15 pages and $149 for 16-25, with 26-plus pages negotiated at the attorney's discretion.
For the consequential tools, yes. All eight tools on the Claude endpoint sit in LegalZoom's attorney-assistance family and require sign-in, and requesting a review requires an entitlement. The Business Attorney Plan runs $259 billed every six months or $469 annually. The cart tool exists precisely to sell you that plan when the entitlement check finds none.
Anthropic's directory lists eight, but LegalZoom's own machine-readable catalogue names nine for the same endpoint. The catalogue adds an attorney-profile lookup and calls the upload tool a different name than the directory does. LegalZoom publishes 24 tools across seven families overall, most of them routed to other AI clients rather than to Claude.
No. The protected-resource descriptor advertises four OAuth scopes, all of them generic identity scopes — sign-in, profile, email and refresh. None separates reading availability from dispatching a review or adding a plan to a cart. Granularity has to come from your client's per-call approval prompt, not from the token you issue.
llms.txt points to. Source of every tool description, input schema and annotation quoted on this page, the nine-tool Claude tool set, the per-integration availability comparison against ChatGPT, the cart tool's checkout-link behaviour and indirectPurchase flag, the review tool's dispatch semantics and urgency/risk enums, the 50-state jurisdiction enum, and the upload tool's format, size and virus-scanning constraints) · retrieved 2026-08-19robots.txt rather than guessed; source of the $259 six-month and $469 annual Business Attorney Plan pricing, the unlimited-30-minute-consults claim and its new-legal-matter definition, the ten-page document-review inclusion and the $69/$149/negotiated overage schedule, the independent-attorneys and not-an-attorney-referral-service disclosure, and the statement that information provided to LegalZoom is not protected by attorney-client privilege) · retrieved 2026-08-19{"error":"Authentication required"} and a www-authenticate Bearer challenge naming a resource_metadata URL in the path-append form. No credentials were supplied, no OAuth flow was begun, and no tool on this server was invoked at any point · retrieved 2026-08-19/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource/mcp/claude/v1 (both fetched 2026-08-19; the root form returns HTTP 200 with a site-wide descriptor carrying no scopes_supported key, the path-append form returns HTTP 200 with the four named scopes, and the path-insert form returns HTTP 404 as 13 bytes of plain text). Source of the four scopes and the resource identifier · retrieved 2026-08-19legalzoom_mcp scope absent from the resource descriptor) · retrieved 2026-08-19text/html bodies, while the unauthenticated default at https://www.legalzoom.com/mcp returned a JSON-RPC 200 whose server instructions state the integration is for information and education only. Source of the finding that the per-client family is real and access-gated · retrieved 2026-08-19www.legalzoom.com/robots.txt (fetched 2026-08-19; allows all crawlers with a long disallow list, names three sitemaps — which is how the attorney-plans page above was located rather than guessed — carries no Content-Signal line, and disallows five named AI crawlers including ClaudeBot and GPTBot from the privacy policy specifically) · retrieved 2026-08-19www.legalzoom.com/llms.txt (fetched 2026-08-19; an unusually substantive file. Source of the pointer to the machine-readable catalogue endpoints, the stated US-primary-jurisdiction scope, the citation and quoting preferences, and the AI-safety note advising that users be told to consult qualified legal professionals) · retrieved 2026-08-19robots.txt explicitly disallows ClaudeBot and four other AI crawlers from this path, so we did not retrieve it and nothing on this page is sourced from it. LegalZoom's binding data commitments live there)Connect LegalZoom once and your agents call these tools on their own: on a schedule, in a workflow, with nobody at the keyboard.