6sense
Ask an AI agent about 6sense account insights, buying signals and keyword trends.
Read, create, complete and delete TickTick tasks, lists, habits and focus records.
Opens Agent Studio, where connecting is one click. The connector URL below works in any MCP client.
Paste it into any MCP client. Setup docs
The TickTick MCP server connects a TickTick account — a cross-platform task manager with habits, a Pomodoro timer and countdowns — to Claude, ChatGPT and any MCP client. It provides 47 tools that search, create, complete, move and delete tasks, lists, folders, tags, habits and focus records. Sign-in is OAuth, or a bearer token where a client cannot do OAuth.
Verified connector
Listed by Anthropic as a partner connector in its Connectors Directory.
Connection checked by Agentman on .
Anthropic states this reflects the level of review a connector received, not a security audit.
Tool names from Anthropic's directory listing. This server requires sign-in, so we could not read tool descriptions or parameter schemas.
tasks:read and tasks:write. Nothing separates the routine write from the irreversible one: the same grant that lets an agent tick off a task lets it call delete_comment, delete_focus and delete_project_group. The scope *names* also understate the reach — they say "tasks", while the surface writes habits, folders, sections, tags and focus records too. Advertised scopes are not enforced scopes, and we could not verify enforcement from outside.delete_task as moving a task to the Trash and documents recovering tasks from there. It documents no equivalent for delete_comment, delete_focus or delete_project_group. delete_project_group dissolves a folder and ungroups every list inside it, which is a structural change to the sidebar rather than the removal of a record.assign_task, unassign_task and project_member are documented by TickTick and absent from the directory snapshot dated 2026-08-16. An audit built on the directory alone will not see them.readOnlyHint/destructiveHint value is published here.batch_add_tasks and create_project consume that quota. No tool spends money, changes a subscription or touches billing.complete_tasks_in_project request, a 14-day maximum range on list_undone_tasks_by_date, one month per get_focuses_by_time query, and 90 days of backdating on upsert_habit_checkins.create_task, complete_task, move_task or delete_task notifies other members depends on per-list notification settings the agent cannot inspect. Treat any write on a shared list as potentially visible.Forty-seven, not the 92 Anthropic's directory appears to list. Those 92 names are 45 capabilities published twice, once in snake_case and once in kebab-case, plus search and fetch which appear only once. Counting the listing without normalising the separator doubles the apparent surface of this connector.
No. TickTick's own documentation describes delete_task as moving a task to the Trash, and its help centre describes recovering deleted tasks from there. Three other delete tools exist though — delete_comment, delete_focus and delete_project_group — and TickTick documents no Trash equivalent for any of them.
Yes, through a tool Anthropic's directory does not list. TickTick's MCP documentation names assign_task, unassign_task and project_member, and its collaboration guide states an assigned member receives a notification reminder in the Notification Center. Assignment on a shared list is therefore an outbound action reaching a colleague.
Two, and neither separates a read from a delete. The server's RFC 9728 descriptor advertised tasks:read and tasks:write on 2026-08-22. Granting tasks:write covers creating a task and deleting a comment alike, and the scope names cover only tasks while the tool surface also writes habits, folders, tags and focus records.
No. TickTick's documentation states the MCP server supports only the Streamable HTTP transport and does not support SSE, so a client limited to SSE cannot connect directly. The endpoint is https://mcp.ticktick.com and the same doc lists working configurations for Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, VS Code and Codex.
No, but the free plan caps what the write tools can create. TickTick's pricing page lists 9 lists, 99 tasks per list, 5 habits and 5 countdowns on the free plan against 299, 999, 299 and 299 on Premium at US$49.99 a year. Batch creation tools reach those ceilings quickly.
No, under normal use. TickTick states that its OAuth authorization supports automatic token refresh, so reauthorization is needed only after a long period of inactivity has expired the token, or if you manually revoke access. A bearer token from Settings then Account then API Token is the documented alternative.
TickTick attributes this to model behaviour rather than the server. Its documentation lists three causes: the model misread the request, it chose the wrong tool, or it passed wrong parameters. The suggested fixes are naming the list, date or priority explicitly, and splitting a complex request so you confirm the target before the action runs.
__NEXT_DATA__ payload, which is where the tool table and FAQ were read from. · retrieved 2026-08-22llms.txt (retrieved 2026-08-22). It indexes 13 articles and does not list the MCP page. · retrieved 2026-08-22https://mcp.ticktick.com returned 401 with a www-authenticate challenge naming the resource metadata document, and RFC 9728 metadata at https://mcp.ticktick.com/.well-known/oauth-protected-resource returned scopes_supported of tasks:read and tasks:write (2026-08-22) · retrieved 2026-08-22https://mcp.ticktick.com/.well-known/oauth-authorization-server (retrieved 2026-08-22) · retrieved 2026-08-22help.ticktick.com/robots.txt and ticktick.com/robots.txt — both permit the paths used here; only /forum is disallowed and no Content-Signal is set (retrieved 2026-08-22) · retrieved 2026-08-22Connect TickTick once and your agents call these tools on their own: on a schedule, in a workflow, with nobody at the keyboard.